Comparisons / Comparison of Buick Regal II Coupe 3.8 V6 Automatic and Ford Mustang Convertible IV 3.8 V6 GT

Comparison of Buick Regal II Coupe 3.8 V6 Automatic and Ford Mustang Convertible IV 3.8 V6 GT [S]ave

Attribute
Buick Regal II Coupe 3.8 V6 Automatic ×
Ford Mustang Convertible IV 3.8 V6 GT ×
General
MakeBuickFord
ModelRegalMustang
GenerationRegal II CoupeMustang Convertible IV
Modification3.8 V6 Automatic3.8 V6 GT
Websitehttps://www.buick.com/https://www.ford.com/
Number of doors22
Number of seats54
Body typeCoupeCabriolet
Transmissionautomatic hydramatic manual
Number of gears35
Production from (year)19781998
Production to (year)19801999
Performance
City consumption (l/100km)13.8-
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)9.8-
Combined consumption (l/100km)11.8-
Drive
DriveRear wheel driveRear wheel drive
Position of engineFront,ongitudinalFront,ongitudinal
FuelPetrol (Gasoline)Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)172152
Max. torque (Nm)359291
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders66
Cylinders arrangementV engineV engine
Valves per cylinder22
Engine displacement (cm³)3,7913,797
Compression ratio89.1
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)4,0004,000
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)2,8002,750
Cylinder bore (mm)96.5296.8
Piston stroke (mm)86.3686
Fuel systemCarburettorMulti-point injection
Valve controlOhv-
TurbineTurbocharger-
Fuel tank (l)6858
Chassis
ABS-+
Front wheel suspensionIndependent, springWishbone
Rear wheel suspensionSuspension De-DionTrailing
Steering typeCone worm with recirculation ballsSteering rack
Power steering-Hydraulic Steering
Front brakesDiscVentilated discs
Rear brakesDrumDisc
Tires size
  • 205/70 R14
  • 225/55 R16
Turning radius (m)12.8-
Dimensions
Length (mm)5,0804,610
Width (mm)1,7811,820
Height (mm)1,3561,360
Wheelbase (mm)2,7462,570
Kerb weight (kg)1,5071,455
Minimum boot space (l)462220
Front track (mm)1,4861,540
Rear track (mm)1,4681,500
Drag coefficient (Cd)0.47-



Help · Contact us · Disclaimer · Contributors · Developers · Donate