Comparison of Mazda 626 III (GD) 2.0 and Ford Ranger II Double Cab 4.0 V6 4x4

Attribute	Ford Ranger II Double Cab 4.0 V6 4x4 ×	Mazda 626 III (GD) 2.0 ×
General
Make	Ford	Mazda
Model	Ranger	626
Generation	Ranger II Double Cab	626 III (GD)
Modification	4.0 V6 4x4	2.0
Website	https://www.ford.com/	https://www.mazda.com/
Number of doors	4	4
Number of seats	5	5
Body type	Pick-up	Sedan
Transmission	manual	manual
Number of gears	5	5
Production from (year)	2006	1987
Production to (year)	2010	1989
Performance
Top speed (km/h)	-	176
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (s)	-	11.3
Drive
Drive	All wheel drive (4x4)	Front wheel drive
Engine type	-	Fuel engine
Position of engine	Front,ongitudinal	Front, transversely
Fuel	Petrol (Gasoline)	Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)	207	90
Max. torque (Nm)	323	150
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders	6	4
Cylinders arrangement	V engine	Inline
Valves per cylinder	2	2
Engine displacement (cm³)	4,014	1,998
Compression ratio	9.7	8.6
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)	5,250	5,200
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)	3,000	3,400
Cylinder bore (mm)	-	86
Piston stroke (mm)	-	86
Fuel system	Multi-point injection	Carburettor
Valve control	Ohc	Ohc
Catalyst	-	Onregular
Fuel tank (l)	64	60
Chassis
ABS	+	-
Front wheel suspension	Independent torsion bar, double wishbone	-
Rear wheel suspension	conditional suspension of twoongitudinal semi-ellipticeaf springs	-
Front suspension	-	Coil springs
Rear suspension	-	Coil springs
Front stabilizer	-	+
Rear stabilizer	-	+
Steering type	Steering rack	-
Front brakes	Ventilated discs	-
Rear brakes	Drum	-
Tires size	235/75 R15 245/70 R16	-
Dimensions
Length (mm)	4,800	4,120
Width (mm)	2,057	2,056
Height (mm)	1,676	1,450