Comparisons / Comparison of Mazda 929 III (HC) 2.0 i V6 and Ford Taurus VI (facelift 2013) 2.0 EcoBoost Automatic

Comparison of Mazda 929 III (HC) 2.0 i V6 and Ford Taurus VI (facelift 2013) 2.0 EcoBoost Automatic [S]ave

Attribute
Ford Taurus VI (facelift 2013) 2.0 EcoBoost Automatic ×
Mazda 929 III (HC) 2.0 i V6 ×
General
MakeFordMazda
ModelTaurus929
GenerationTaurus VI (facelift 2013)929 III (HC)
Modification2.0 EcoBoost Automatic2.0 i V6
Websitehttps://www.ford.com/https://www.mazda.com/
Number of doors44
Number of seats55
Body typeSedanSedan
Transmissionautomatic selectshift manual
Number of gears65
Production from (year)20131989
Production to (year)20191993
Performance
City consumption (l/100km)10.6-
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)7.3-
Combined consumption (l/100km)9.4-
Drive
DriveFront wheel driveRear wheel drive
Position of engineFront, transverselyFront,ongitudinal
FuelPetrol (Gasoline)Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)240145
Max. torque (Nm)366231
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders46
Cylinders arrangementInlineV engine
Valves per cylinder42
Engine displacement (cm³)1,9991,997
Compression ratio9.38
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)5,5005,000
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)3,0002,500
Cylinder bore (mm)87.574
Piston stroke (mm)83.177.4
Fuel systemDirect injectionMono-point injection
Valve controlDohc, ti-vct-
TurbineTurbocharger-
Fuel tank (l)7270
Engine oil capacity (l)5.2-
Coolant capacity (l)11-
Chassis
ABS++
Front wheel suspension-Helical spring
Rear wheel suspension-Helical spring
Steering typeSteering rack-
Power steering-Hydraulic Steering
Front brakesVentilated discsVentilated discs
Rear brakesDiscDisc
Tires size
  • 255/45 R19
  • 195/65 R15 91 H
Turning radius (m)12.1-
Dimensions
Length (mm)5,1544,690
Width (mm)1,9351,695
Height (mm)1,5421,425
Wheelbase (mm)2,8682,710
Kerb weight (kg)1,7981,420
Minimum boot space (l)569427
Front track (mm)1,6591,440
Rear track (mm)1,6641,450
Drag coefficient (Cd)0.3-



Help · Contact us · Disclaimer · Contributors · Developers · Donate