Comparison of Chrysler 200 I 2.4 Automatic and Toyota MR 2 (_W2

Comparison of Chrysler 200 I 2.4 Automatic and Toyota MR 2 (_W2_) 2.2i 16V Automatic [S]ave

Attribute	Chrysler 200 I 2.4 Automatic ×	Toyota MR 2 (_W2_) 2.2i 16V Automatic ×
General
Make	Chrysler	Toyota
Model	200	MR 2
Generation	200 I	MR 2 (_W2_)
Modification	2.4 Automatic	2.2i 16V Automatic
Website	https://www.chrysler.com/	https://www.toyota.com/
Number of doors	4	2
Number of seats	5	2
Body type	Sedan	Coupe
Transmission	automatic	automatic
Number of gears	4	4
Production from (year)	2011	1995
Production to (year)	2014	1999
Performance
City consumption (l/100km)	11.2	-
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)	7.8	-
Combined consumption (l/100km)	9.8	9.5
Emission standard	EURO IV	-
Drive
Drive	Front wheel drive	Rear wheel drive
Position of engine	Front, transversely	Front, transversely
Fuel	Petrol (Gasoline)	Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)	175	136
Max. torque (Nm)	225	196
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders	4	4
Cylinders arrangement	Inline	Inline
Valves per cylinder	4	4
Engine displacement (cm³)	2,360	2,166
Compression ratio	10.5	9.7
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)	6,000	5,400
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)	4,400	4,000
Cylinder bore (mm)	88	87.1
Piston stroke (mm)	97	90.9
Fuel system	Multi-point injection	Multi-point injection
Valve control	Dohc-vvt	Dohc
Fuel tank (l)	64	54
Engine oil capacity (l)	4.23	-
Coolant capacity (l)	6.8	-
Chassis
ABS	+	+
Front wheel suspension	Independent, Spring McPherson, with stabilizer	Wishbone
Rear wheel suspension	Independent, spring multi-link with stabilizer	The depreciated rack
Steering type	Steering rack	Steering rack
Power steering	-	Hydraulic Steering
Front brakes	Ventilated discs	Ventilated discs
Rear brakes	Disc	Ventilated discs
Tires size	225/50 R18 225/55 R17	195/55 R15 225/50 R15
Turning radius (m)	11.12	-
Dimensions
Length (mm)	4,870	4,171
Width (mm)	1,843	1,700
Height (mm)	1,482	1,234
Wheelbase (mm)	2,765	2,400
Kerb weight (kg)	1,543	1,206
Front track (mm)	1,567	1,470
Rear track (mm)	1,594	1,450
Drag coefficient (Cd)	0.34	-