Comparisons / Comparison of Citroen BX 4 TC 2.0 4x4 and Ford Mustang Convertible VI 2.3 EcoBoost

Comparison of Citroen BX 4 TC 2.0 4x4 and Ford Mustang Convertible VI 2.3 EcoBoost [S]ave

Attribute
Ford Mustang Convertible VI 2.3 EcoBoost ×
Citroen BX 4 TC 2.0 4x4 ×
General
MakeFordCitroen
ModelMustangBX
GenerationMustang Convertible VIBX
Modification2.3 EcoBoost4 TC 2.0 4x4
Websitehttps://www.ford.com/https://www.citroen.com/
Number of doors25
Number of seats45
Body typeCabrioletHatchback
Transmissionmanualmanual
Number of gears65
Production from (year)20151985
Production to (year)20171985
Performance
Top speed (km/h)-220
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (s)-7.5
Combined consumption (l/100km)8.2-
CO2 emissions (g/km)184-
Drive
DriveRear wheel driveAll wheel drive (4x4)
Position of engineFront, transverselyFront, transversely
FuelPetrol (Gasoline)Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)317200
Max. torque (Nm)432294
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders44
Cylinders arrangementInlineInline
Valves per cylinder44
Engine displacement (cm³)2,2642,141
Compression ratio9.57
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)5,5005,250
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)3,0002,750
Cylinder bore (mm)87.5591.4
Piston stroke (mm)9481.6
Fuel systemDirect injectionMulti-point injection
Valve controlDohc-
TurbineTurbocharger / IntercoolerTurbocharging / Mechanical supercharging (Compressor)
Fuel tank (l)5983
Engine oil capacity (l)5.7-
Chassis
ABS+-
Front wheel suspensionMcPhersonHydro-pneumatic element
Rear wheel suspensionIndependent, spring multi-link with stabilizerTrailing
Steering typeSteering rackSteering rack
Front brakesVentilated discsVentilated discs
Rear brakesVentilated discsVentilated discs
Tires size
  • 255/40 R19
-
Turning radius (m)12.2-
Dimensions
Length (mm)4,7844,512
Width (mm)1,9161,830
Height (mm)1,3941,310
Wheelbase (mm)2,7202,612
Kerb weight (kg)1,7151,280
Minimum boot space (l)332-
Front track (mm)1,5821,548
Rear track (mm)1,6551,548
Drag coefficient (Cd)-0.38



Help · Contact us · Disclaimer · Contributors · Developers · Donate