Comparisons / Comparison of Rover 200 Cabrio (XW) 214 i and Ford Puma (ECT) 1.4 16V

Comparison of Rover 200 Cabrio (XW) 214 i and Ford Puma (ECT) 1.4 16V [S]ave

Attribute
Rover 200 Cabrio (XW) 214 i ×
Ford Puma (ECT) 1.4 16V ×
General
MakeRoverFord
Model200Puma
Generation200 Cabrio (XW)Puma (ECT)
Modification214 i1.4 16V
Websitehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rover_Companyhttps://www.ford.com/
Number of doors23
Number of seats44
Body typeCabrioletCoupe
Transmissionmanualmanual
Number of gears55
Production from (year)19931997
Production to (year)20002003
Performance
Top speed (km/h)182180
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (s)11.511.9
City consumption (l/100km)-9.5
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)-5.9
Combined consumption (l/100km)7.2-
Drive
DriveFront wheel driveFront wheel drive
Engine type-Fuel engine
Position of engineFront, transverselyFront, transversely
FuelPetrol (Gasoline)Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)10390
Max. torque (Nm)127125
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders44
Cylinders arrangementInlineInline
Valves per cylinder44
Engine displacement (cm³)1,3961,388
Compression ratio9.510.3
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)6,0005,500
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)5,0004,500
Cylinder bore (mm)7576
Piston stroke (mm)7976.5
Fuel systemMulti-point injectionMulti-point injection
Valve controlDohcDohc
Catalyst-Regular
Fuel tank (l)5542
Chassis
ABS++
Front wheel suspensionWishboneThe depreciated rack
Rear wheel suspensionHelical springHelical spring
Front suspension-Coil springs
Rear suspension-Coil springs
Front stabilizer-+
Rear stabilizer-+
Steering typeSteering rackSteering rack
Power steeringHydraulic SteeringHydraulic Steering
Front brakesDiscVentilated discs
Rear brakesDrumDrum
Tires size
  • 175/65 R14 H
  • 195/50 R15
Dimensions
Length (mm)4,2203,984
Width (mm)1,6801,674
Height (mm)1,3901,345
Wheelbase (mm)2,5502,446
Kerb weight (kg)1,0751,035
Gross weight (kg)1,5501,400
Minimum boot space (l)300240
Front track (mm)1,4751,450
Rear track (mm)1,4701,411



Help · Contact us · Disclaimer · Contributors · Developers · Donate