Comparisons / Comparison of Rover 200 Cabrio (XW) 214 i and Ford Puma (ECT) 1.4 16V

Comparison of Rover 200 Cabrio (XW) 214 i and Ford Puma (ECT) 1.4 16V [S]ave

Attribute
Ford Puma (ECT) 1.4 16V ×
Rover 200 Cabrio (XW) 214 i ×
General
MakeFordRover
ModelPuma200
GenerationPuma (ECT)200 Cabrio (XW)
Modification1.4 16V214 i
Websitehttps://www.ford.com/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rover_Company
Number of doors32
Number of seats44
Body typeCoupeCabriolet
Transmissionmanualmanual
Number of gears55
Production from (year)19971993
Production to (year)20032000
Performance
Top speed (km/h)180182
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (s)11.911.5
City consumption (l/100km)9.5-
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)5.9-
Combined consumption (l/100km)-7.2
Drive
DriveFront wheel driveFront wheel drive
Engine typeFuel engine-
Position of engineFront, transverselyFront, transversely
FuelPetrol (Gasoline)Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)90103
Max. torque (Nm)125127
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders44
Cylinders arrangementInlineInline
Valves per cylinder44
Engine displacement (cm³)1,3881,396
Compression ratio10.39.5
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)5,5006,000
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)4,5005,000
Cylinder bore (mm)7675
Piston stroke (mm)76.579
Fuel systemMulti-point injectionMulti-point injection
Valve controlDohcDohc
CatalystRegular-
Fuel tank (l)4255
Chassis
ABS++
Front wheel suspensionThe depreciated rackWishbone
Rear wheel suspensionHelical springHelical spring
Front suspensionCoil springs-
Rear suspensionCoil springs-
Front stabilizer+-
Rear stabilizer+-
Steering typeSteering rackSteering rack
Power steeringHydraulic SteeringHydraulic Steering
Front brakesVentilated discsDisc
Rear brakesDrumDrum
Tires size
  • 195/50 R15
  • 175/65 R14 H
Dimensions
1↑Length (mm)3,9844,220
Width (mm)1,6741,680
Height (mm)1,3451,390
Wheelbase (mm)2,4462,550
Kerb weight (kg)1,0351,075
Gross weight (kg)1,4001,550
Minimum boot space (l)240300
Front track (mm)1,4501,475
Rear track (mm)1,4111,470



Help · Contact us · Disclaimer · Contributors · Developers · Donate