Comparisons / Comparison of Ford C-MAX 2.0 16V and Kia Optima IV 2.0 GDI Plug-in Hybrid Automatic

Comparison of Ford C-MAX 2.0 16V and Kia Optima IV 2.0 GDI Plug-in Hybrid Automatic [S]ave

Attribute
Kia Optima IV 2.0 GDI Plug-in Hybrid Automatic ×
Ford C-MAX 2.0 16V ×
General
MakeKiaFord
ModelOptimaC-MAX
GenerationOptima IVC-MAX
Modification2.0 GDI Plug-in Hybrid Automatic2.0 16V
Websitehttps://www.kia.comhttps://www.ford.com/
Number of doors45
Number of seats55
Body typeSedanMPV
Transmissionautomaticmanual
Number of gears65
Production from (year)20162003
Production to (year)20182007
Performance
Top speed (km/h)-203
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (s)-9.8
City consumption (l/100km)-10
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)4.45.6
Combined consumption (l/100km)1.337.3
CO2 emissions (g/km)37-
Emission standardEURO VI-
Drive
DriveFront wheel driveFront wheel drive
Position of engineFront, transverselyFront,ongitudinal
FuelHybrid - petrol / electricityPetrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)154145
Max. torque (Nm)189185
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders44
Cylinders arrangementInlineInline
Valves per cylinder44
Engine displacement (cm³)1,9991,999
Compression ratio13.510.8
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)6,0006,000
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)5,0004,500
Cylinder bore (mm)8187.5
Piston stroke (mm)9783.1
Fuel systemDirect injectionMulti-point injection
Valve controlCvvtDohc
Fuel tank (l)-55
Electromotor
Battery capacity (kw)9.8-
Chassis
ABS++
Front wheel suspensionIndependent, Spring McPherson, with stabilizer-
Rear wheel suspensionMulti-link independent-
Steering typeSteering rackSteering rack
Power steeringElectric SteeringHydraulic Steering
Front brakesVentilated discsDisc
Rear brakesDiscDisc
Tires size
  • 215/55 R17
  • 205/55 R16
Turning radius (m)10.910.7
Dimensions
Length (mm)4,8554,330
Width (mm)1,8601,820
Height (mm)1,4651,600
Wheelbase (mm)2,8052,640
Kerb weight (kg)1,7801,294
Minimum boot space (l)307-
Max. roof load (kg)100-
Ride height (mm)135-
Drag coefficient (Cd)0.25-



Help · Contact us · Disclaimer · Contributors · Developers · Donate