Factopedia
[O]bjects
[C]omparisons
Comparisons
/ Comparison of Ford Mustang Convertible V 4.6 i V8 24V and Ford Shelby II GT 4.6 V8
Please fix the following errors:
Comparison of Ford Mustang Convertible V 4.6 i V8 24V and Ford Shelby II GT 4.6 V8
[S]ave
Attribute
Ford Mustang Convertible V 4.6 i V8 24V
×
Ford Shelby II GT 4.6 V8
×
General
Make
Ford
Ford
Model
Mustang
Shelby
Generation
Mustang Convertible V
Shelby II
Modification
4.6 i V8 24V
GT 4.6 V8
Website
https://www.ford.com/
https://www.ford.com/
Number of doors
2
2
Number of seats
4
4
Body type
Cabriolet
Coupe
Transmission
manual
manual
Number of gears
5
5
Production from (year)
2005
2007
Production to (year)
2014
2009
Performance
Top speed (km/h)
230
-
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (s)
5.3
-
City consumption (l/100km)
13.9
14.7
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)
9.4
10.2
Combined consumption (l/100km)
-
12.4
Drive
Drive
Rear wheel drive
Rear wheel drive
Position of engine
Front,ongitudinal
Front,ongitudinal
Fuel
Petrol (Gasoline)
Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)
304
324
Max. torque (Nm)
434
447
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders
8
8
Cylinders arrangement
V engine
V engine
Valves per cylinder
3
3
Engine displacement (cm³)
4,601
4,601
Compression ratio
9.8
9.8
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)
5,750
5,750
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)
4,500
4,500
Cylinder bore (mm)
90.2
90.2
Piston stroke (mm)
90
90
Fuel system
Multi-point injection
Multi-point injection
Valve control
-
-
Fuel tank (l)
61
60
Chassis
ABS
-
+
Front wheel suspension
The depreciated rack
-
Rear wheel suspension
Trailing
-
Steering type
Steering rack
Steering rack
Front brakes
Disc
Ventilated discs
Rear brakes
Disc
Disc
Tires size
235/55 R17
235/50 ZR18
Turning radius (m)
-
11.5
Dimensions
Length (mm)
4,765
4,765
Width (mm)
1,877
1,877
Height (mm)
1,415
1,372
Wheelbase (mm)
2,720
2,720
Kerb weight (kg)
1,685
1,525
Minimum boot space (l)
275
-
Front track (mm)
1,585
1,582
Rear track (mm)
1,600
1,587
Help
·
Contact us
·
Disclaimer
·
Contributors
·
Developers
·
Donate