Factopedia
[O]bjects
[C]omparisons
Comparisons
/ Comparison of Ford Mustang Convertible V 4.0 i V6 12V and Holden UTE 3.8i V6
Please fix the following errors:
Comparison of Ford Mustang Convertible V 4.0 i V6 12V and Holden UTE 3.8i V6
[S]ave
Attribute
Ford Mustang Convertible V 4.0 i V6 12V
×
Holden UTE 3.8i V6
×
General
Make
Ford
Holden
Model
Mustang
UTE
Generation
Mustang Convertible V
UTE
Modification
4.0 i V6 12V
3.8i V6
Website
https://www.ford.com/
https://www.holden.com.au/
Number of doors
2
2
Number of seats
4
2
Body type
Cabriolet
Pick-up
Transmission
manual
manual
Number of gears
5
5
Production from (year)
2005
1997
Production to (year)
2014
2003
Performance
Top speed (km/h)
180
200
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (s)
7
9
City consumption (l/100km)
12.4
-
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)
10.2
-
Drive
Drive
Rear wheel drive
Front wheel drive
Position of engine
Front,ongitudinal
Front,ongitudinal
Fuel
Petrol (Gasoline)
Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)
212
200
Max. torque (Nm)
325
304
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders
6
6
Cylinders arrangement
V engine
V engine
Valves per cylinder
2
2
Engine displacement (cm³)
4,009
3,791
Compression ratio
9.7
9.4
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)
5,200
5,200
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)
3,500
3,600
Cylinder bore (mm)
100.4
96.5
Piston stroke (mm)
84.4
86.4
Fuel system
Multi-point injection
Multi-point injection
Valve control
-
-
Fuel tank (l)
61
80
Chassis
Front wheel suspension
The depreciated rack
Helical spring
Rear wheel suspension
Trailing
Helical spring
Steering type
Steering rack
Steering rack
Front brakes
Disc
Ventilated discs
Rear brakes
Disc
Drum
Tires size
215/65 R16
205/65 R15
Dimensions
Length (mm)
4,765
4,861
Width (mm)
1,877
1,794
Height (mm)
1,415
1,448
Wheelbase (mm)
2,720
2,731
Kerb weight (kg)
1,625
1,450
Minimum boot space (l)
275
-
Front track (mm)
1,585
1,491
Rear track (mm)
1,600
1,491
Help
·
Contact us
·
Disclaimer
·
Contributors
·
Developers
·
Donate