Factopedia
[O]bjects
[C]omparisons
Comparisons
/ Comparison of Ford Mustang Convertible III 4.9 V8 and Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 HSV
Please fix the following errors:
Comparison of Ford Mustang Convertible III 4.9 V8 and Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 HSV
[S]ave
Attribute
Holden UTE 5.0 i V8 HSV
×
Ford Mustang Convertible III 4.9 V8
×
General
Make
Holden
Ford
Model
UTE
Mustang
Generation
UTE
Mustang Convertible III
Modification
5.0 i V8 HSV
4.9 V8
Website
https://www.holden.com.au/
https://www.ford.com/
Number of doors
2
2
Number of seats
2
4
Body type
Pick-up
Cabriolet
Transmission
manual
manual
Number of gears
5
5
Production from (year)
1997
1978
Production to (year)
2003
1993
Performance
Top speed (km/h)
220
220
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (s)
9
-
City consumption (l/100km)
-
20
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)
-
12
Drive
Drive
Front wheel drive
Rear wheel drive
Position of engine
Front,ongitudinal
Front,ongitudinal
Fuel
Petrol (Gasoline)
Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)
243
228
Max. torque (Nm)
400
407
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders
8
8
Cylinders arrangement
V engine
V engine
Valves per cylinder
2
2
Engine displacement (cm³)
4,981
4,942
Compression ratio
-
9
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)
4,800
4,200
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)
3,600
3,200
Cylinder bore (mm)
-
101.6
Piston stroke (mm)
-
76.2
Fuel system
Mono-point injection
Multi-point injection
Valve control
Dohc
-
Fuel tank (l)
80
58
Chassis
ABS
-
+
Front wheel suspension
Helical spring
Helical spring
Rear wheel suspension
Helical spring
Helical spring
Steering type
Steering rack
Steering rack
Power steering
-
Hydraulic Steering
Front brakes
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Rear brakes
Drum
Disc
Tires size
205/65 R15
225/55 ZR16
Dimensions
Length (mm)
4,861
4,560
Width (mm)
1,794
1,735
Height (mm)
1,448
1,320
Wheelbase (mm)
2,731
2,555
Kerb weight (kg)
1,450
1,380
Minimum boot space (l)
-
180
Front track (mm)
1,491
1,440
Rear track (mm)
1,491
1,450
Help
·
Contact us
·
Disclaimer
·
Contributors
·
Developers
·
Donate