Comparisons / Comparison of Nissan Teana 2.0 i 16V (136) and Kia Optima I (facelift 2003) 2.0i 16V Automatic

Comparison of Nissan Teana 2.0 i 16V (136) and Kia Optima I (facelift 2003) 2.0i 16V Automatic [S]ave

Attribute
Nissan Teana 2.0 i 16V (136) ×
Kia Optima I (facelift 2003) 2.0i 16V Automatic ×
General
MakeNissanKia
ModelTeanaOptima
GenerationTeanaOptima I (facelift 2003)
Modification2.0 i 16V (136)2.0i 16V Automatic
Websitehttps://www.nissan-global.com/https://www.kia.com
Number of doors44
Number of seats55
Body typeSedanSedan
Transmissionautomaticautomatic
Number of gears44
Production from (year)20032003
Production to (year)20082005
Performance
Top speed (km/h)180195
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (s)12.510.6
City consumption (l/100km)13.213.1
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)8.17.7
Combined consumption (l/100km)109.7
Drive
DriveFront wheel driveFront wheel drive
Position of engineFront, transverselyFront,ongitudinal
FuelPetrol (Gasoline)Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)136136
Max. torque (Nm)187181
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders44
Cylinders arrangementInlineInline
Valves per cylinder44
Engine displacement (cm³)1,9981,997
Compression ratio-10
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)6,0006,000
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)4,0004,000
Cylinder bore (mm)8985
Piston stroke (mm)80.388
Fuel systemMulti-point injectionMulti-point injection
Valve controlDohcDohc
Fuel tank (l)7065
Engine oil capacity (l)-4.3
Coolant capacity (l)-6.5
Chassis
ABS++
Front wheel suspensionHelical springDouble wishbone
Rear wheel suspensionThe depreciated rackTransverse stabilizer
Steering typeSteering rackSteering rack
Front brakesVentilated discsVentilated discs
Rear brakesDiscDisc
Tires size
  • 205/65 R16
  • 195/70 R14
  • 205/60 R15
Dimensions
Length (mm)4,8454,720
Width (mm)1,7651,815
Height (mm)1,4751,410
Wheelbase (mm)2,7752,700
Kerb weight (kg)1,4551,403
Gross weight (kg)1,9001,985
Minimum boot space (l)476385
Front track (mm)1,5301,540
Rear track (mm)1,5351,520



Help · Contact us · Disclaimer · Contributors · Developers · Donate