Comparisons / Comparison of Ural Ranger Frog and Ural Ranger Tundra

Comparison of Ural Ranger Frog and Ural Ranger Tundra [S]ave

Attribute
Ural Ranger Frog
×

Ural Ranger Tundra
×
General
Production from (year)20142014
MakeUralUral
ModelUral Ranger FrogUral Ranger Tundra
CategoryClassicClassic
Engine and transmission
Engine typeTwo cylinder boxer, four-strokeTwo cylinder boxer, four-stroke
Fuel systemInjection. EFICarburettor
Displacement (cm³)745745
Power (kw)28.428.4
Fuel consumption (l/100km)7.57.5
Cooling systemAirAir
Transmission type,final driveShaft drive (cardan)Shaft drive (cardan)
Torque (Nm)5252
Bore (mm)7878
Stroke (mm)7878
Gearbox4-speed4-speed
Greenhouse gases174.0 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission)174.0 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission)
IgnitionElectronicElectronic
ClutchDry double discDry double disc
Chassis
Front suspensionLeading link forks with hydraulic spring shockLeading link forks with hydraulic spring shock
Rear suspensionDouble sided swinging arm with hydraulic spring shock absorbers -Double sided swinging arm with hydraulic spring shock absorbers -
Front brakesSingle discSingle disc
Rear brakesExpanding brake (drum brake)Expanding brake (drum brake)
Frame typeDouble loop steel tubeDouble loop steel tube
Wheels3 cross-spoked wheels plus 1 reserve wheel3 cross-spoked wheels plus 1 reserve wheel
Other
StarterElectric & kickElectric & kick
Color options
  • light green
  • dark green
Dimensions
Dry weight (kg)350350
Power/weight ratio0.08110.0811
Overall height (mm)1,1001,100
Overall length (mm)2,5802,580
Overall width (mm)1,7001,700
Seat height (mm)790790
Performance
Top speed (km/h)100100
Fuel capacity (l)1919



Help · Contact us · Disclaimer · Contributors · Developers · Donate