Factopedia
[O]bjects
[C]omparisons
Comparisons
/ Comparison of Lincoln LS 4.0 V8 32V and Ford Mustang Convertible VI GT 5.0 V8
Please fix the following errors:
Comparison of Lincoln LS 4.0 V8 32V and Ford Mustang Convertible VI GT 5.0 V8
[S]ave
Attribute
Ford Mustang Convertible VI GT 5.0 V8
×
Lincoln LS 4.0 V8 32V
×
General
Make
Ford
Lincoln
Model
Mustang
LS
Generation
Mustang Convertible VI
LS
Modification
GT 5.0 V8
4.0 V8 32V
Website
https://www.ford.com/
https://www.lincoln.com/
Number of doors
2
4
Number of seats
4
5
Body type
Cabriolet
Sedan
Transmission
manual
automatic
Number of gears
6
4
Production from (year)
2015
1998
Production to (year)
2017
2000
Performance
Top speed (km/h)
-
220
City consumption (l/100km)
15.7
16
Extra-urban consumption (l/100km)
9.4
9
Combined consumption (l/100km)
12.4
-
Drive
Drive
Rear wheel drive
Rear wheel drive
Position of engine
Front, transversely
Front,ongitudinal
Fuel
Petrol (Gasoline)
Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)
426
256
Max. torque (Nm)
529
354
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders
8
8
Cylinders arrangement
V engine
V engine
Valves per cylinder
4
4
Engine displacement (cm³)
4,951
3,950
Compression ratio
11
10.5
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)
6,500
6,100
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)
4,250
4,250
Cylinder bore (mm)
92.2
86
Piston stroke (mm)
92.7
85
Fuel system
Multi-point injection
Multi-point injection
Valve control
Dohc
Dohc
Fuel tank (l)
60
68
Chassis
ABS
+
+
Front wheel suspension
-
Helical spring
Rear wheel suspension
-
Helical spring
Steering type
Steering rack
Steering rack
Power steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Front brakes
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Rear brakes
Ventilated discs
Disc
Tires size
235/50 R18
215/60 R15
Turning radius (m)
11.52
-
Dimensions
Length (mm)
4,783
4,925
Width (mm)
1,915
1,860
Height (mm)
1,394
1,450
Wheelbase (mm)
2,720
2,910
Minimum boot space (l)
-
380
Front track (mm)
1,582
1,535
Rear track (mm)
1,648
1,545
Drag coefficient (Cd)
0.35
-
Help
·
Contact us
·
Disclaimer
·
Contributors
·
Developers
·
Donate