Factopedia
[O]bjects
[C]omparisons
Comparisons
/ Comparison of Lincoln Mark VIII 4.6 i V8 32V LSC and Ford Shelby II Cabrio GT 4.6 V8 Automatic
Please fix the following errors:
Comparison of Lincoln Mark VIII 4.6 i V8 32V LSC and Ford Shelby II Cabrio GT 4.6 V8 Automatic
[S]ave
Attribute
Lincoln Mark VIII 4.6 i V8 32V LSC
×
Ford Shelby II Cabrio GT 4.6 V8 Automatic
×
General
Make
Lincoln
Ford
Model
Mark
Shelby
Generation
Mark VIII
Shelby II Cabrio
Modification
4.6 i V8 32V LSC
GT 4.6 V8 Automatic
Website
https://www.lincoln.com/
https://www.ford.com/
Number of doors
2
2
Number of seats
5
4
Body type
Coupe
Cabriolet
Transmission
automatic
automatic
Number of gears
4
5
Production from (year)
1996
2008
Production to (year)
2000
2009
Performance
Combined consumption (l/100km)
11.3
-
Drive
Drive
Rear wheel drive
Rear wheel drive
Position of engine
Front,ongitudinal
Front,ongitudinal
Fuel
Petrol (Gasoline)
Petrol (Gasoline)
Max. power (hp)
290
324
Max. torque (Nm)
400
447
Fuel Engine
Number of cylinders
8
8
Cylinders arrangement
V engine
V engine
Valves per cylinder
4
3
Engine displacement (cm³)
4,601
4,601
Compression ratio
9.9
9.8
Max. power @ rpm (rpm)
5,750
5,750
Max. torque @ rpm (rpm)
4,500
4,500
Cylinder bore (mm)
90.2
90.2
Piston stroke (mm)
90
90
Fuel system
Multi-point injection
Multi-point injection
Valve control
Dohc
-
Fuel tank (l)
68
60
Chassis
ABS
+
+
Front wheel suspension
Double wishbone
-
Rear wheel suspension
Double wishbone
-
Steering type
-
Steering rack
Power steering
Hydraulic Steering
-
Front brakes
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Rear brakes
Disc
Disc
Tires size
225/60 R16 V
235/50 ZR18
Dimensions
Length (mm)
5,265
4,765
Width (mm)
1,900
1,877
Height (mm)
1,361
1,415
Wheelbase (mm)
2,870
2,720
Kerb weight (kg)
1,715
1,665
Minimum boot space (l)
264
-
Front track (mm)
1,565
1,582
Rear track (mm)
1,529
1,587
Drag coefficient (Cd)
-
0.38
Help
·
Contact us
·
Disclaimer
·
Contributors
·
Developers
·
Donate